Do you believe in theory that there was an advanced human race before us on earth?

Discussion in 'Mayberry Lounge' started by Panmisiek, Oct 11, 2018.

  1. HunterAcosta

    HunterAcosta Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2017
    Messages:
    1,690
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Oh yeah . No doubt . It would be cruel trick if the multiverses if WE were the pinnacle of earth”s evolution .
     
  2. Merlotte's

    Merlotte's Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    10,366
    Likes Received:
    4,112
    Location:
    AK
    I want to know what kind of porn people were into 12,000 years ago.

    Bet you some of them bitches were doing anal.

    Everywhere you look there's a bitch doing anal.
     
    LHWBelt and JonesBsample like this.
  3. moreorless87

    moreorless87 Disarming Posting

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    31,717
    Likes Received:
    17,354
    No more discovery channel for Sherdog.
     
  4. IloveTHIS

    IloveTHIS Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    12,190
    Likes Received:
    14,443
    Edit nvm
     
  5. Plutoburn

    Plutoburn Alpha booze head

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    9,349
    Likes Received:
    2,943
    Where are the plastics?
     
  6. Phlog

    Phlog Dad Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Messages:
    10,253
    Likes Received:
    8,098
    Agriculture and the domestication of cows happened about 10 or 11 thousand years ago. That's what gave us cities and modern civilisation. We have archeological evidence for this supposition I believe.

    The native American Indians were a good example of how hunter gatherers just don't progress past an effective model. Farmers have surplus food and surplus time, trade is a way of life.

    So your premise rests on false assumptions.
     
  7. BearGrounds

    BearGrounds A great many scalps.

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    10,178
    Location:
    On the frontier, west of the Hudson river.
    There's a theory that the Great Pyramid is some form of geo-transducer, constructed to convert telluric energies into electrical energy for local use (power plant theory). This could be seen as being in line with a technological manner of advancement that is more honed to nature and its phenomena, than our current incarnation of human advancement.

    In other words, a civilization so in tune to the unseen forces, to the point of harnessing them for mechanical use, can easily be assumed to have avoided, or simply not developed, things like our modern day plastics.

    Such a structure would indicate an entirely different path of technological progression.

    Which are you referring to particularly?

    Because nobody knows who built a lot of these ancient sites. Teotihuacan is a great example. The Aztecs merely settled its ruins, but had no part in its construction. They themselves only spoke tales about the supposed builders.

    [​IMG]

    Natives had cataclysm stories as well. Arizona's Pima Indians said that their ancestors came from an island at the center of the world, before it sank beneath the waves (Atlantis refugees?).
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2018
    Fugazy and 90 50 like this.
  8. BearGrounds

    BearGrounds A great many scalps.

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    10,178
    Location:
    On the frontier, west of the Hudson river.
    Kailasa temple, Ellora.



    Looks like they were running trains back then fam, and made a few carvings to prove it. Dat kamasutra...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Jumpy, Merlotte's and TheLinguist like this.
  9. Madmick

    Madmick Scholar of Taghaza Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    39,191
    Likes Received:
    30,561
    Location:
    NorCal
    Of course not. The archaeological evidence is suspiciously...not there at all.
     
  10. Ichibanner

    Ichibanner Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    1,578
    Likes Received:
    1,082
    Location:
    Maryland
    I re-read through this thread. The TS didn't mention 12,000 years ago in his first post nor did he define "advanced" at that time. I think some people are now hung up on 12,000 years ago (evidence of a great flood around 12,000 years ago) and "advanced" as defined within our current level of tech.

    If we start talking about 5,000 years ago instead of 12,000 we put the timeline nearly 2,500 years before Mesopotamia if my math is correct which it may not be. If we define "advanced" as structure-building, ocean traveling, or having tooling and metallurgy then the possibility of a lost civilization increases IMO. It's easier to imagine that we might find evidence of a civilization from 5,000 years ago that had boats and buildings than it is to imagine one from 13,000 years ago that had all of that and cable TV.

    We're still finding ruins today using our current known satellite tech. Who knows what the future holds.
     
    LHWBelt and Slick_36 like this.
  11. Bacco

    Bacco Red Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2015
    Messages:
    7,695
    Likes Received:
    13,344
    Location:
    Italy
    Girls in Sodoma were pretty on it, but watch your back
     
    Merlotte's and 90 50 like this.
  12. Slick_36

    Slick_36 Born Again Primitive

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    8,341
    Location:
    The Celestial Anvil
    I used to be a hardcore believer in this, just got done reading a book that changed my perspective a bit. I still think humanity was "advanced" in prehistory, but I used to be really generous with how advanced and how far back I went.

    Civilization popped up around 9,000 years ago because of agriculture, but places like Gobekli Tepe paint a different picture. We can find advanced stone age tools sandwhiched in between times of total primitivity, up until around 50,000 years ago when "modern" humans began consistently making advanced tools and crafts. What this seems to mean is that humanity flourishes when we spread ideas and preserve them.

    This makes me think that humanity had 50,000 years of development, in that time I think they probably rose to an "advanced" state before the great melting 12,000 years ago. If it took a few thousand years to come back up, it probably only had time to pop up once before before a cataclysm knocked it back down.

    I think the biggest fallacy is thinking it had to look like our civilization to be advanced, like we're the end goal for humanity. We're a branch of humanity is all. Our knowledge is fragile, losing it resets us entirely, we could have had an established agrarian civilization rise and fall before we cemented ourselves today. If anything we're vulnerable to that loss of knowledge with just a solar event knocking us off the electrical grid.
     
    90 50 likes this.
  13. badascan

    badascan Pugnacious Audacious Moral Nihilist Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2014
    Messages:
    4,105
    Likes Received:
    3,236
    Location:
    On the Water
    don't try to set me up i'm not the troglodyte you'd like me to be.... those are in question but i'd say things/places like baalbek or Derinkuyu or tiwanacu and pumapunku... now go ahead and look up the official explanation and skeptics debunking, copy and paste call me a moron and we can move on...
     
  14. Eazy123

    Eazy123 Black Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages:
    5,778
    Likes Received:
    9,358
    With all these kids eating Tide pods and shit yes neanderthals were a more advanced race
     
    Fugazy and 90 50 like this.
  15. Slick_36

    Slick_36 Born Again Primitive

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    8,341
    Location:
    The Celestial Anvil
    I don't know about more advanced. They had larger brain casings but ours have actually shrunk in the past few thousand years, leading scientists to think it's more so how efficient the wiring is than how big the brain is. There's not a lot of archeological sites that show equal sophistication to homo sapien sapiens, and the few we have could actually be human sites crossing over since they would share the same safe spaces over thousands of years. I love me some Neanderthals though, they were badass.
     
  16. MusterX

    MusterX Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    36,839
    Likes Received:
    31,559
    There is also a thought that there is possibly ancient unknown civilizations under the ice in Antarctica. I think there is still so much we don't know about this planet and the history of our species. Anatomically modern humans have been around for 200,000 years. Think about how long that is. Geologists like Randall Carlson have been collecting data on these possible events in the past that may have sort of reset humanity and likely its happened over and over, not just once or twice.
     
    90 50 likes this.
  17. MusterX

    MusterX Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    36,839
    Likes Received:
    31,559
    I saw one of Rogan's podcasts recently where he was talking about how all of our knowledge is becoming digital so that if anything happens in the future that resets civilization, almost all of our knowledge will be lost because it won't be written down anymore, it will all be stored digitally and instantly destroyed.
     
    90 50 likes this.
  18. MusterX

    MusterX Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    36,839
    Likes Received:
    31,559
    I think at some point you are going to eat your words.
     
  19. MusterX

    MusterX Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    36,839
    Likes Received:
    31,559
    Well for one thing these civilizations might only have mostly items of cloth or wood so no, there wouldn't be much left after 12,000 years. I mean we found Gobekli Tepe which is 11,000+ years old and the only reason we got lucky and found that is because its stone monoliths.

    [​IMG]

    Even our civilization, after 12,000 years there would be fuck all left except plastics probably. Our major downtown areas like Chicago or L.A. would be swallowed up by the Earth over the course of 12 millennia.
     
    90 50 and Slick_36 like this.
  20. Slick_36

    Slick_36 Born Again Primitive

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    8,341
    Location:
    The Celestial Anvil
    Concrete foundations would probably remain. But yeah, it's entirely feasible that you could have a real civilization that doesn't show many signs after nature reclaims it.
     
    MusterX likes this.

Share This Page